Vol. 18, Issue 2, 2009September 01, 2009 PDT
IN RE HYDROGEN PEROXIDE ANTITRUST LITIGATION: A FORECAST OF THE FUTURE OF CLASS CERTIFICATION IN THE NINTH CIRCUIT
IN RE HYDROGEN PEROXIDE ANTITRUST LITIGATION: A FORECAST OF THE FUTURE OF CLASS CERTIFICATION IN THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Caroline Mitchell, Michael Scott,
Articles in Vol. 18, Issue 2, 2009
Vol. 18, Issue 2, 2009
- “SOCRATIC SOLITAIRE” – IMPLICATIONS OF IN RE TOBACCO II FOR PROOF OF INJURY IN ANTITRUST AND UNFAIR COMPETITION CLASS ACTIONSCharles H. Samel
- IN RE HYDROGEN PEROXIDE ANTITRUST LITIGATION: A FORECAST OF THE FUTURE OF CLASS CERTIFICATION IN THE NINTH CIRCUITCaroline MitchellMichael Scott
- MEYER v. SPRINT SPECTRUM, L.P.: THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT TOUGHENS STANDING REQUIREMENTS UNDER THE CONSUMERS LEGAL REMEDIES ACTDaveed A. Schwartz
- ASHCROFT v. IQBAL: THE SUPREME COURT’S ATTEMPT TO CLARIFY BELL ATLANTIC v. TWOMBLYMatthew Fischer
Caroline Mitchell & Michael Scott, IN RE HYDROGEN PEROXIDE ANTITRUST LITIGATION: A FORECAST OF THE FUTURE OF CLASS CERTIFICATION IN THE NINTH CIRCUIT, 18 Competition Journal (2009).