Vol. 18, Issue 2, 2009September 01, 2010 PDT
“SOCRATIC SOLITAIRE” – IMPLICATIONS OF IN RE TOBACCO II FOR PROOF OF INJURY IN ANTITRUST AND UNFAIR COMPETITION CLASS ACTIONS
“SOCRATIC SOLITAIRE” – IMPLICATIONS OF IN RE TOBACCO II FOR PROOF OF INJURY IN ANTITRUST AND UNFAIR COMPETITION CLASS ACTIONS
Charles H. Samel,
Articles in Vol. 18, Issue 2, 2009
Vol. 18, Issue 2, 2009
- “SOCRATIC SOLITAIRE” – IMPLICATIONS OF IN RE TOBACCO II FOR PROOF OF INJURY IN ANTITRUST AND UNFAIR COMPETITION CLASS ACTIONSCharles H. Samel
- IN RE HYDROGEN PEROXIDE ANTITRUST LITIGATION: A FORECAST OF THE FUTURE OF CLASS CERTIFICATION IN THE NINTH CIRCUITCaroline MitchellMichael Scott
- MEYER v. SPRINT SPECTRUM, L.P.: THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT TOUGHENS STANDING REQUIREMENTS UNDER THE CONSUMERS LEGAL REMEDIES ACTDaveed A. Schwartz
- ASHCROFT v. IQBAL: THE SUPREME COURT’S ATTEMPT TO CLARIFY BELL ATLANTIC v. TWOMBLYMatthew Fischer
Charles H. Samel, “SOCRATIC SOLITAIRE” – IMPLICATIONS OF IN RE TOBACCO II FOR PROOF OF INJURY IN ANTITRUST AND UNFAIR COMPETITION CLASS ACTIONS, 18 Competition Journal (2010).