Vol. 13, Issue 2, 2004September 01, 2004 PDT
The Trinko Case: Rise of a Restrictive Approach to Section 2 Analysis, and Fall of the Duty to Cooperate with Rivals
The Trinko Case: Rise of a Restrictive Approach to Section 2 Analysis, and Fall of the Duty to Cooperate with Rivals
Howard M. Ullman,
Articles in Vol. 13, Issue 2, 2004
Vol. 13, Issue 2, 2004
- The Trinko Case: Rise of a Restrictive Approach to Section 2 Analysis, and Fall of the Duty to Cooperate with RivalsHoward M. Ullman
- The Availablity of Damages for Monopolization Under California LawCharles H. Samel
- What is “Unfair”? Developments in 17200 Law After Cel-TechDaniel K. Slaughter
- The Legality of Patent Licensing Schemes Under the Antitrust LawsPamela Pham
Howard M. Ullman, The Trinko Case: Rise of a Restrictive Approach to Section 2 Analysis, and Fall of the Duty to Cooperate with Rivals, 13 Competition Journal (2004).