Articles in Vol. 14, Issue 1, 2005
Vol. 14, Issue 1, 2005
- PRIVATE “REPRESENTATIVE ACTIONS” UNDER CALIFORNIA’S UNFAIR COMPETITION LAW AFTER PROPOSITION 64: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSISGerald E. HawxhurstKevin Y. Teruya
- PROPOSITION 64 DOES NOT APPLY TO PENDING CASESBonny E. Sweeney
- PROPOSITION 64 APPLIES TO PENDING CASESThomas S. Hixson
- IS UCL FRAUD NOW AKIN TO COMMON LAW FRAUD? RELIANCE, MATERIALITY AND CAUSATION AFTER PROPOSITION 64Andrew B. SerwinRussell L. Carlberg
- PROBLEMS IN PARTNERING WITH PUBLIC PROSECUTORSBarbara M. Motz
- HAVE UNFAIR COMPETITION CLAIMS BECOME “FEDERALIZED” AFTER PROPOSITION 64 AND THE CLASS ACTION FAIRNESS ACT?Amy DarbyAmy Maclear
- CALIFORNIA ANTITRUST AND UNFAIR COMPETITION LAW UPDATEThomas GreeneThomas A. Papageorge
Thomas S. Hixson, PROPOSITION 64 APPLIES TO PENDING CASES, 14 Competition Journal (2005).