Vol. 15, Issue 1, 2006March 01, 2006 PDT
IMPLICATIONS OF THE CLASS ACTION FAIRNESS ACT FOR ANTITRUST CASES: FROM FILING THROUGH TRIAL
IMPLICATIONS OF THE CLASS ACTION FAIRNESS ACT FOR ANTITRUST CASES: FROM FILING THROUGH TRIAL
Lisa Saveri,
Articles in Vol. 15, Issue 1, 2006
Vol. 15, Issue 1, 2006
- THE CLASS ACTION FAIRNESS ACT OF 2005: ONE YEAR LATERThomas S. Hixson
- IMPLICATIONS OF THE CLASS ACTION FAIRNESS ACT FOR ANTITRUST CASES: FROM FILING THROUGH TRIALLisa Saveri
- A STATE-BY-STATE LOOK AT THE LAW ON INDIRECT PURCHASER DAMAGE ACTIONSGerald E. Hawxhurst
- MARKET COMPETITIVENESS: DOES STATE ANTITRUST LAW NEED TO BE UPDATED?Don T. Hibner Jr.Heather M. Cooper
- STATEMENT OF HON.VAUGHN WALKERVAUGHN WALKER
- STATEMENT OF KATHLEEN FOOTEKATHLEEN FOOTE
- STATEMENT OF THOMAS A. PAPAGEORGETHOMAS A. PAPAGEORGE
- STATEMENT OF PROFESSOR CARL SHAPIROCARL SHAPIRO
- STATEMENT OF PROFESSOR HOWARD A. SHELANSKIHOWARD A. SHELANSKI
- STATEMENT OF PROFESSOR MARK A. LEMLEYMARK A. LEMLEY
- STATEMENT OF BONNY E. SWEENEYBONNY E. SWEENEY
- STATEMENT OF DANIEL J. MOGINDANIEL J. MOGIN
- STATEMENT OF J.THOMAS ROSCHJ.THOMAS ROSCH
- STATEMENT OF DON T. HIBNER, JR.DON T. HIBNER Jr.
- STATEMENT OF THOMAS GREENE CONCERNING STATE MERGER ENFORCEMENTTHOMAS GREENE
Lisa Saveri, IMPLICATIONS OF THE CLASS ACTION FAIRNESS ACT FOR ANTITRUST CASES: FROM FILING THROUGH TRIAL, 15 Competition Journal (2006).