Vol. 16, Issue 2, 2007September 01, 2007 PDT
ANTITRUST DAMAGES CLAIMS ARISING OUT OF THE CALIFORNIA ELECTRICITY CRISIS: AN ANALYSIS OF FEDERAL JURISDICTION, PREEMPTION, AND THE FILED RATE DOCTRINE
ANTITRUST DAMAGES CLAIMS ARISING OUT OF THE CALIFORNIA ELECTRICITY CRISIS: AN ANALYSIS OF FEDERAL JURISDICTION, PREEMPTION, AND THE FILED RATE DOCTRINE
Geoffrey T. Holtz,
Articles in Vol. 16, Issue 2, 2007
Vol. 16, Issue 2, 2007
- ANTITRUST DAMAGES CLAIMS ARISING OUT OF THE CALIFORNIA ELECTRICITY CRISIS: AN ANALYSIS OF FEDERAL JURISDICTION, PREEMPTION, AND THE FILED RATE DOCTRINEGeoffrey T. Holtz
- FILLING THE REGULATORY GAP: CALIFORNIA NATURAL GAS ANTITRUST LITIGATIONCraig C. CorbittJiangxiao Athena Hou
- THE SUPREME COURT’S LEEGIN DECISION ON RESALE PRICE MAINTENANCE: MAINTAINING UNCERTAINTYBrian RobisonSoña Garcia
- CREDIT SUISSE: SUPREME COURT LIMITS ANTITRUST CLAIMS ARISING FROM REGULATED INVESTMENT BANKING ACTIVITYHoward M. Ullman
- AN IMBALANCE OF REPRESENTATION: A CRITIQUE OF THE ANTITRUST MODERNIZATION COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING CIVIL REMEDIES IN PRIVATE ANTITRUST CASESJoshua P. Davis
- TYING LAW: THE CLASH BETWEEN THE SUPREME COURT AND LOWER COURTSM. Brian McMahon
Geoffrey T. Holtz, ANTITRUST DAMAGES CLAIMS ARISING OUT OF THE CALIFORNIA ELECTRICITY CRISIS: AN ANALYSIS OF FEDERAL JURISDICTION, PREEMPTION, AND THE FILED RATE DOCTRINE, 16 Competition Journal (2007).