Vol. 17, Issue 1, 2008March 01, 2008 PDT
JUDGMENT-SHARING AGREEMENTS: FAIR TO DEFENDANTS OR ANOTHER ANTICOMPETITIVE RESTRAINT?
JUDGMENT-SHARING AGREEMENTS: FAIR TO DEFENDANTS OR ANOTHER ANTICOMPETITIVE RESTRAINT?
Daniel T. Dobrygowski,
Articles in Vol. 17, Issue 1, 2008
Vol. 17, Issue 1, 2008
- THE NINTH CIRCUIT’S LINKLINE DECISION: A FLAWED APPLICATION OF INTRACIRCUIT STARE DECISIS?John M. LandryBethany M. Stevens
- NEGOTIATING ANTITRUST PROVISIONS IN ACQUISITION AGREEMENTSCraig WaldmanJennifer DiNucci
- JUDGMENT-SHARING AGREEMENTS: FAIR TO DEFENDANTS OR ANOTHER ANTICOMPETITIVE RESTRAINT?Daniel T. Dobrygowski
- DISCOVERY OF EUROPEAN COMMISSION MATERIALS IN US CIVIL ANTITRUST LITIGATION: DOES US DISCOVERY THREATEN EUROPE’S COMPETITION ENFORCEMENT REGIME?Terry CalvaniKate S. McMillan
- 2007 DEVELOPMENTS IN CALIFORNIA CLASS ACTION LAWPamela M. Parker
Daniel T. Dobrygowski, JUDGMENT-SHARING AGREEMENTS: FAIR TO DEFENDANTS OR ANOTHER ANTICOMPETITIVE RESTRAINT?, 17 Competition Journal (2008).