Vol. 19, Issue 2, 2010September 01, 2010 PDT
IS THE FTAIA JURISDICTIONAL? SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION AFTER ARBAUGH AND REED ELSEVIER
IS THE FTAIA JURISDICTIONAL? SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION AFTER ARBAUGH AND REED ELSEVIER
Sylvie K. Kern,
Articles in Vol. 19, Issue 2, 2010
Vol. 19, Issue 2, 2010
- THE “CON” SIDE: OUTSOURCING JUSTICE: THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT’S DECISION IN COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA V. SUPERIOR COURT (ATLANTIC RICHFIELD)William L. SternNicholas A. Roethlisberger
- THE “PRO” SIDE THE COLLABORATION BETWEEN PUBLIC ENTITIES AND PRIVATE COUNSEL: PROSECUTING CASES THAT OTHERWISE MIGHT NOT BE BROUGHTBruce L. SimonWilliam J. Newsom
- THE REVITALIZATION OF A VALUABLE CAUSE OF ACTION FOR COMPETITORS: CLAYWORTH V. PFIZER’S IMPLICATIONS FOR UCL STANDING IN COMPETITOR LAWSUITSMatthew K. Wegner
- CLAYWORTH V. PFIZER: CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT LAYS DOWN THE LAW IN FAVOR OF STRICT ANTITRUST ENFORCEMENTGene CrewHolly Gaudreau
- THE RESTITUTIONARY CLAIM REQUIREMENT FOR STANDING UNDER THE UCL: DOES CLAYWORTH V. PFIZER END THE DEBATE?Daniel K. Slaughter
- OFFENSIVE COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL IN CIVIL ANTITRUST CASES: PARKLANE HOISERY AND THE SEVENTH AMENDMENTAsim M. Bhansali
- IMPLICATIONS OF DUKES ON THE PREDOMINANCE ANALYSIS UNDER SUBDIVISION (b)(3)Michele Floyd
- THE RISE OF THE “PRIVATE SURGEON GENERAL”William L. SternJanelle J. Sahouria
- THE CAPPER-VOLSTEAD ACT EXEMPTION AND SUPPLY RESTRAINTS IN AGRICULTURAL ANTITRUST ACTIONSKenneth R. O’RourkeAndrew Frackman
- SHAMES V. CALIFORNIA TRAVEL & TOURISM OPINION COMMISSION: BROADENING THE SCOPE OF STATE ACTION IMMUNITYStuart C. PlunkettChristie L. Yang
- COMPETITORS BEWARE: BAY GUARDIAN MAKES IT HARDER TO AVOID AND DEFEND “BELOW-COST” PRICING CLAIMS IN CALIFORNIAFrank M. HinmanDavid (“Duff”) Beach
- IS THE FTAIA JURISDICTIONAL? SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION AFTER ARBAUGH AND REED ELSEVIERSylvie K. Kern
Sylvie K. Kern, IS THE FTAIA JURISDICTIONAL? SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION AFTER ARBAUGH AND REED ELSEVIER, 19 Competition Journal (2010).