This website uses cookies

We use cookies to enhance your experience and support COUNTER Metrics for transparent reporting of readership statistics. Cookie data is not sold to third parties or used for marketing purposes.

Skip to main content
Competition Journal
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • Competition Journal Articles
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • search
  • RSS feed (opens a modal with a link to feed)

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

http://localhost:18628/feed
Competition Journal Articles
Vol. 23, Issue 1, 2014March 01, 2014 PDT

DO FIRST AMENDMENT PRINCIPLES LIMIT THE ANTITRUST AGENCIES’ ABILITY TO PROHIBIT ENFORCEMENT OF STANDARDS-ESSENTIAL PATENTS?

Fabien Thayamballi, David L. Meyer,

Articles in Vol. 23, Issue 1, 2014

Vol. 23, Issue 1, 2014
  • LANDMARK CIVIL PRICE-FIXING VERDICTS OF 2013: LESSONS FROM THE VITAMIN C AND URETHANES TRIALS With Trial Counsel and Observers William A. Isaacson, Daniel S. Mason, Joseph Goldberg, and Michael Tubach
    Heather Tewksbury
  • LCD REDUX: FOLLOW-ON CLASS ACTION AND DIRECT PURCHASER LITIGATION FROM 2012’S DOJ CRIMINAL PROSECUTIONS Views from Trial Experts Bruce Simon, Howard Varinsky, and Robert Freitas
    Michael J. KassAton Arbisser
  • JUDGES SPEAK OUT: THE MAKE-OR-BREAK MOMENT OF CERTIFYING A CLASS With Judges Marsha Berzon, Virginia Phillips, John Wiley, and Curtis Karnow
    Penelope A. PreovolosDominique-Chantale Alepin
  • TRIAL BY SAMPLE: A POST-GAME, LOCKER ROOM CHAT EXPLORING THE MCADAMS V. MONIER TRIAL: A ROUNDTABLE With Trial Counsel Jeffrey Cereghino and William Stern
    Asim BhansaliKimberly Kralowec
  • THE SUPREME COURT IN BOROUGH OF DURYEA V. GUARNIERI SIGNALS A RETREAT FROM PRE’S BROAD DEFERENCE TO THE RIGHT TO PETITION
    Chris O’Connell
  • NOERR-PENNINGTON: SAFEGUARDING THE FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHT TO PETITION THE GOVERNMENT
    Stuart N. SenatorGregory M. Sergi
  • THE IRRELEVANCE OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE MODERN REGULATION OF THE INTERNET
    Richard Epstein
  • FIRST AMENDMENT PROTECTION FOR SEARCH ENGINE SEARCH RESULTS
    Eugene VolokhDonald M. Falk
  • DOES THE FIRST AMENDMENT IMMUNIZE GOOGLE’S SEARCH ENGINE SEARCH RESULTS FROM GOVERNMENT ANTITRUST SCRUTINY?
    Paula Lauren Gibson
  • DO FIRST AMENDMENT PRINCIPLES LIMIT THE ANTITRUST AGENCIES’ ABILITY TO PROHIBIT ENFORCEMENT OF STANDARDS-ESSENTIAL PATENTS?
    Fabien ThayamballiDavid L. Meyer
  • THE MARKET-PARTICIPANT EXCEPTION TO STATEACTION IMMUNITY FROM ANTITRUST LIABILITY
    Jarod M. BonaLuke A. Wake
  • THE MISAPPLICATION OF MATSUSHITA’S HEIGHTENED SUMMARY JUDGMENT STANDARD
    Ara Jabagchourian
  • REGULATION OF COMPANIES’ DATA SECURITY PRACTICES UNDER THE FTC ACT AND CALIFORNIA UNFAIR COMPETITION LAW
    Kathryn F. Russo
  • UPDATE ON CALIFORNIA STATE ANTITRUST AND UNFAIR COMPETITION LAW AND FEDERAL AND STATE PROCEDURAL LAW
    Thomas GreeneThomas A. Papageorge
Competition Journal
Fabien Thayamballi & David L. Meyer, DO FIRST AMENDMENT PRINCIPLES LIMIT THE ANTITRUST AGENCIES’ ABILITY TO PROHIBIT ENFORCEMENT OF STANDARDS-ESSENTIAL PATENTS?, 23 Competition Journal (2014).
Save article as...▾

View more stats

Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system