Vol. 21, Issue 1, 2012March 01, 2012 PDT
REVISITING MATERIALITY IN THE CONTEXT OF CLRA AND UCL CLAIMS: WHY MATERIALITY DOES NOT EQUAL A SAFETY RISK
REVISITING MATERIALITY IN THE CONTEXT OF CLRA AND UCL CLAIMS: WHY MATERIALITY DOES NOT EQUAL A SAFETY RISK
James C. Shah, Rose F. Luzon,
Articles in Vol. 21, Issue 1, 2012
Vol. 21, Issue 1, 2012
- THE FTAIA—A CHANGING LANDSCAPESylvie K. Kern
- CLOSING THE COURTHOUSE DOORS TO CONSUMER CLASS ACTIONS? WHAT RECENT CASE LAW REVEALS ABOUT SUCCESSFUL ENFORCEMENT OF ARBITRATION AGREEMENTS AND CLASS ACTION WAIVERSCharles H. SamelAmanda J. Beane
- REVISITING MATERIALITY IN THE CONTEXT OF CLRA AND UCL CLAIMS: WHY MATERIALITY DOES NOT EQUAL A SAFETY RISKJames C. ShahRose F. Luzon
James C. Shah & Rose F. Luzon, REVISITING MATERIALITY IN THE CONTEXT OF CLRA AND UCL CLAIMS: WHY MATERIALITY DOES NOT EQUAL A SAFETY RISK, 21 Competition Journal (2012).