Vol. 25, Issue 1, 2016March 01, 2016 PDT
THE NEXIUM TRIAL PIONEERS ACTAVIS’ ACTIVATION: A ROUNDTABLE OF NEXIUM’S COUNSEL REFLECT ON THEIR SIX-WEEK TRIAL
THE NEXIUM TRIAL PIONEERS ACTAVIS’ ACTIVATION: A ROUNDTABLE OF NEXIUM’S COUNSEL REFLECT ON THEIR SIX-WEEK TRIAL
Cheryl Lee Johnson,
Articles in Vol. 25, Issue 1, 2016
Vol. 25, Issue 1, 2016
- CALIFORNIA ANTITRUST AND UNFAIR COMPETITION LAW UPDATE: PROCEDURAL LAWThomas Greene
- CALIFORNIA ANTITRUST AND UNFAIR COMPETITION LAW UPDATE: SUBSTANTIVE LAWThomas A. Papageorge
- 2015: A YEAR OF BIG PLAINTIFF WINS IN ANTITRUST AND PRIVACY CASESThomas N. Dahdouh
- KEYNOTE ADDRESS: A CONVERSATION WITH THE HONORABLE TANI CANTIL-SAKAUYE, CHIEF JUSTICE OF CALIFORNIACheryl Lee JohnsonKathleen J. Tuttle
- GOLDEN STATE INSTITUTE 25TH ANNIVERSARY RETROSPECTIVE AND PROSPECTIVE VIEWS ON CALIFORNIA ANTITRUST AND UNFAIR COMPETITION LAWCraig Corbitt
- MANAGING ANTITRUST AND COMPLEX BUSINESS TRIALS—A VIEW FROM THE BENCHNiall E. Lynch
- THE NEXIUM TRIAL PIONEERS ACTAVIS’ ACTIVATION: A ROUNDTABLE OF NEXIUM’S COUNSEL REFLECT ON THEIR SIX-WEEK TRIALCheryl Lee Johnson
- BIG STAKES ANTITRUST TRIALS: O’BANNON V. NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATIONDavid W. Kesselman
- SETTLEMENT NEGOTIATION TACTICS, CONSIDERATIONS AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT PROVISIONS IN ANTITRUST AND UCL CASES: A ROUNDTABLEPaul Riehle
- CONSIDERATIONS, NOT LIMITATIONS: AN ARGUMENT AGAINST DEFINING THE ANTICOMPETITIVE HARM UNDER F.T.C. V. ACTAVIS AS THE “ELIMINATION OF THE RISK OF POTENTIAL COMPETITION”Anna M. Fabish
- THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME PEOPLE’S COURT IN QIHOO V. TENCENT AND THE RULE OF LAW IN CHINA: SEEKING TRUTH FROM FACTSEmilio VaraniniFeng Jiang
- ROYAL PRINTING AND THE FTAIARobert E. Freitas
- THE UCL—NOW A MONEY BACK GUARANTEE?Michele Floyd
- FTC DATA SECURITY ENFORCEMENT: ANALYZING THE PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURECrystal N. Skelton
Cheryl Lee Johnson, THE NEXIUM TRIAL PIONEERS ACTAVIS’ ACTIVATION: A ROUNDTABLE OF NEXIUM’S COUNSEL REFLECT ON THEIR SIX-WEEK TRIAL, 25 Competition Journal (2016).